LAWS(BOM)-2018-6-189

SBI CARDS Vs. ROHIDAS JADHAV

Decided On June 11, 2018
Sbi Cards Appellant
V/S
Rohidas Jadhav Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Respondent to the Execution Application has been evading service of this Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. He was served by an authorized officer of the Claimant, Ms Fatema Kalyanwala by sending a PDF and message to his mobile number as a WhatsApp message. For the purposes of service of Notice under Order XXI Rule 22, I will accept this. I do so because the icon indicators clearly show that not only was the message and its attachment delivered to the Respondent's number but that both were opened.

(2.) The Claimants have also learnt that the Respondent resides at Nalasopara in a place which he seems to have taken on rent. The Claimant will furnish the particulars of address so that a warrant, if necessary can be issued against him.

(3.) In the meantime, the present Notice is made absolute.