MANISH LALITKUMAR BAVISHI Vs. ADDL. DIR. GENERAL, DRI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) P .C.: Rule. Heard forthwith. The petitioner by his letter dated 23 -11 -2007 sought copies of the documents seized in the office premises on 20 -2 -2007 under panchanama and print outs drawn from the Laptop during his attendance in DRI. In response to his application, petitioner received a communication on 18 -12 -2007 wherein it was set out that the documents would be provided to him on completion of the investigation. It was men set out that the petitioner may inspect all the documents and if any document is found relevant to the present show cause notices issued the copies of the same would be supplied to the petitioner.

(2.) IT is on account of failure by the respondent to make available the documents to the present petitioner.

(3.) FROM the language of the sub -section, it is clear that it is mandatory on the officer of Customs to make available the copies asked for. The choice of either asking for the document or seeking extract is of the party concerned and not that of the officer. In other words, if any document is seized during the course of any action by an officer and relatable to the provisions of the Customs Act, that officer is bound to make available those documents. The action, therefore, of the respondents in communicating to the petitioner that documents would not be available, is clearly an act without jurisdiction. We fail to understand as to why statutory authority failed to discharge the duties according to law and driving the party to this Court for seeking relief.