(1.) Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith and is heard.
(2.) This criminal revision application is directed against the order below Exh.34 in Special Case No.8 of 1998. The order under challenge was delivered on 23rd June 2006 and the learned Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act Cases) Raigad held that the order of sanction for prosecution of the present applicant - original accused is legal, valid and proper and the trial can proceed further in pursuance of the same.
(3.) It is aggrieved by this order that the present revision application is filed.