RAGHUNATH MUKAND DANGARE Vs. SHYAMKANT EKNATH DANGARE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Smt. Suhasini Mutalik and Shri Sadanand Pandit the learned counsel for both the sides.

(2.) THERE is absolutely no reason whatsoever to justify interference with impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India more so when proper reasons are assigned by the learned Additional District Judge. Those reasons are fully supported by the material on record. Even on reassessment there is no scope for interference.

(3.) THIS apart the conduct of the petitioner is almost reprehensible as he exhibited no compunction to make any statement on any forum without any intention to honour the said premises or assurance. A short survey of certain events would make the situation quite clear and which situation forfeits any right or claim in law as also in equity of the petitioner.