LAWS(BOM)-2016-8-240

AMBADAS Vs. KINTETIC ENGINEERING LTD.

Decided On August 31, 2016
Ambadas Appellant
V/S
Kintetic Engineering Ltd. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

(2.) The Petitioner is aggrieved by the judgement dated 16.03.2013 delivered by the Labour Court by which his Complaint (ULP) No. 37/2010 was dismissed. The Labour Court concluded that the punishment of dismissal from service for a proved misconduct of sleeping on duty was not shockingly disproportionate.

(3.) The Petitioner is also aggrieved by the judgement dated 29.02.2016 delivered by the Industrial Court by which Revision (ULP) No. 1/2014 filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed.