LAWS(BOM)-2016-3-59

GAJANAN Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided On March 09, 2016
GAJANAN Appellant
V/S
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the judgment dated 21/08/2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur in Sessions Trial No. 23/2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the Penal Code) and has been sentenced for imprisonment for life. He has also been sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further simple imprisonment for one year.

(2.) The facts as can be gathered from the case of the prosecution are that the appellant was married to one Laxmi. As the appellant was having illicit relations with some other lady, he disliked his wife. The appellant used to harass her and used to sent her to her parental home. On 22/04/2011, at about 01:00 p.m., the appellant had beaten his wife-Laxmi and had asked her to leave her house. He thereafter poured kerosene upon her and set her on fire. The parents of the appellant, however, poured water upon her and took her to the hospital. She was initially taken to the hospital at Pandharkawada and then to Yavatmal. Her statement was recorded by a Police Officer attached to Yavatmal Police Station. On 26/04/2011, she was shifted to the hospital at Sevagram where she expired on 27/04/2011 at 09:30 p.m. Her dying declaration was recorded by the Naib Tahasildar. Initially, an offence under Section 307 of the Penal Code was registered and after her death, the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Penal Code was added.

(3.) After completing the investigation, the appellant was charged for the offences punishable under Section 302 and Section 498-A of the Penal Code. As the appellant did not plead guilty, he was tried after the case was committed to the Sessions Court. At the conclusion of the trial, the appellant came to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Penal Code, but was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Penal Code. Hence this appeal.