(1.) The Petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 25.07.1997 by which Revision (ULP) No.75/1995 filed by the Respondent/ MSRTC was allowed and Revision (ULP) No.366/1995 filed by the Petitioner/ Employee was rejected.
(2.) The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has strenuously criticized the impugned judgment of the Industrial Court on the following grounds:
(3.) None appears for the Respondent/ MSRTC despite the matter having been adjourned on 15.12.2016.