KAMLESH Vs. SUSHIL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Since the issues involved in these family court appeals are identical and since the parties to the appeals are the same, they are heard together and are decided by this common judgment.

(2.) Sangeeta, the appellant in Family Court Appeal No. 58 of 2015 is the original respondent No. 1 in Hindu Marriage Petition No. A839 of 2012, that was filed by her husband Sushil. So also, Kamlesh, the appellant in Family Court Appeal No. 67 of 2015 is the respondent No. 2 to Hindu Marriage Petition, bearing No. A839 of 2012, filed by Sushil for a decree of divorce against Sangeeta on the ground that Sangeeta had voluntary sexual intercourse with Kamlesh and hence, the marriage between Sushil and Sangeeta may be dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(3.) Few facts giving rise to these family court appeals are stated thus -