(1.) This writ petition raises an important question of law as to whether the cost of packaging of excisable goods can be included for the purpose of determining the value thereof under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). Now, we should have thought that this question has already been determined and concluded by a Division Bench Judgment of this Court in (First Appeal No. 257 of 1972 delivered on the 16th of September, 1974)l by one of us (Mukhi, J.). It requires to be noticed that in that judgment reference is made to a judgment of the Supreme Court in (A.K. Roy v. Voltas Ltd.)A.I.R. 1973 S C 225. case in which the scope and content of section 4 of the Act was considered.
(2.) The learned Counsel for the respondents has, however, contended that these decisions did not conclude the questions which arise in the petition before us. He added that there were certain contentions which did not arise in previous cases. It will, therefore, be necessary to examine the ratio of these judgments in relation to the facts of this case. Before we discuss the contentions raised before us in this petition, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts, which fortunately are not many and largely undisputed. The petitioners, Messrs. Ogale Glass Works Ltd., manufacture at Ogalewadi as well as at Pimpri, among other things, glass and glassware. In particular, they manufacture tumblers, jars and pressed-ware bottles of different kinds as well as glass bricks and tiles.
(3.) These products are charged to Excise Duty ad valorem under the Act and the relevant Item in the First Schedule is Item 23-A, which reads as follows: