REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Madhav Ramdas Gaikwad Appellant

V/S

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

RAM MANOHAR LOHIA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
PUSHKAR MUKHERJEE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
KANU BISWAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
HARADHAN SAHA MADAN LAL AGARWALA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
HEMLATA KANTILAL SHAH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
MUSTAKMIYA JABBARMIYA SHAIKH VS. M M MEHTA COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
PHULWARI JAGDAMBAPRASAD PATHAK VS. R H MENDONCA [REFERRED TO]
AMEENA BEGUM VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. K. Bhosale for the petitioner and learned APP Mr. V. K. Kotecha for respondents - State.

(2.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties.

(3.) The petitioner challenges the detention order dtd. 1/10/2024 bearing No.2024/RB-1/Desk-2/T-4/MPDA/CR-49 passed by respondent No.1 as well as the approval order dtd. 11/10/2024 and the confirmation order dtd. 4/12/2024 passed by respondent No.3, by invoking the powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Click here to view full judgment.

MADHAV RAMDAS GAIKWAD Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address