THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. BHARAT CHEMICALS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This Appeal has been admitted on the following substantial question of law:

(2.) Mr.A.S. Rao, appearing in support of the Appeal would submit that very few facts are required to be referred by this Court for determining this question of law. The respondent Assessee is engaged in manufacturing of Paracetamol (bulk drug) falling under Chapter sub heading No. 2907.90 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It is chargeable to duty @ 10% Adv. in terms of Notification No. 6 of 1994 : , dated 1st March, 1994. Thus, for purpose of both home consumption and export, the Assessee can clear the goods and at the stage of removal thereof, he is required to pay Adv. Duty @ 10% in terms of this notification, which benefit has been availed of by the Assessee in both situations, namely of export and home consumption. However, in one particular clearance and for export, the Assessee paid duty at 20% and utilised excess Modvat credit on the goods cleared for export. Therefore, the Range Superintendent issued a show cause cum demand notice dated 3rd October, 1994, requiring it to show cause why the sum of Rs.5,54,600/-should not be recovered from the Assessee under Rule 57 I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

(3.) Mr. Rao submits that the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise passed an order of adjudication on 28th March, 1996, and he confirmed the demand. This order was upheld partially by the Commissioner (Appeals), by his order dated 26th July, 1998.