DTTU GUNDU PARIT Vs. JAVAHAR NANCHAND SHAH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition impugns a judgment and order dated 21/7/1989 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune, camp at Kolhapur on 20/12/1990 in Revision application No. MRT-KP-124 of 1989 whereby, the Designated Member of the maharashtra Revenue Tribunal allowed the revision application and set aside an order dated 21/7/1989 passed by the Sub-Divisional officer Gadhinglaj Division, Gadhinglaj in tenancy Appeal No. 16/1985. The S. D. O. Gadhinglaj had earlier partly allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and order passed by the A. L. T. Bhudargad in Tenancy case No. 32-G Gargoti -342 on 31.5.1985 and had remanded the matter for fresh enquiry under Section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act").

(2.) The brief facts of the case are as follows:a) That Survey No. 40/2 of Village gargoti admeasured 1-Acre, 13-Gunthas. The said land originally belonged to one Nanchand shah. In the year 1948, one Gundu who was the father of the present petitioner is said to have taken the aforesaid land from Nanchand shah for the purpose of cultivation as a tenant. The said Gundu-original tenant died in the year 1952 and the land was thereafter being jointly cultivated by the petitioner and one Kondiba gopal Desai. b) On 22/6/1956, Kondiba Gopal desai and the petitioner are said to have executed a document in which it was stated that they were voluntarily surrendering their tenancy rights. The said document mentioned that they would not claim any tenancy right in future and that they had surrendered the possession of the land to the landlord. A certified true copy of this document which does not bear the actual signatures of the petitioner and Kondiba Desai or the witnesses has been produced on record in 32-G proceeding (at page 95 of the trial court's file). Based on this document, the landlord Nanchand initiated tenancy Case No. 239/1956 before the tahsildar, Bhudargad for recovery of possession under Section 29 of the said Act. In this tenancy proceeding, on 23/8/1956, a joint statement of the petitioner and Mr. Kondiba Gopal Desai came to be recorded (copy on record) without their actual signatures and without the actual signature of the tahsildar Bhudargad (at Page 97 of the file). On 23/8/1956, Mamlatdar, Bhudargad is said to have passed a final order in Tenancy case no. 239/1956 directing that on verification of the deed he found that the tenants had surrendered the possession voluntarily and therefore, ordering that the possession of the land be restored to the landlord under Section 29 (3) of the said Act. Subsequently, in the year 1974, 32-G proceedings were initiated in respect of the said land. Initially by an order dated 3/4/1974, the Additional Tahasildar, bhudargad recorded a finding that the tenant had appeared before him on his own accord and made a statement that he did not wish to purchase the land and therefore, the purchase was being declared ineffective and the proceedings under Section 32-P of the said Act were directed to be taken. This order was confirmed by the Sub-Divisional Officer on 3/4/1980 but set aside the order passed by the m. R. T. on 18/9/1981. The M. R. T. remanded the matter for fresh enquiry under Section 32-G. c) After remand the A. L. T. re-decided the matter on 31/5/1985 holding that the petitioner was not a tenant of the suit land and hence, he was not entitled to purchase it under Section 32-G. The appeal against this order was partly allowed by the Sub Divisional officer by his judgment and order dated 21/7/1989 and remanded the matter. The m. R. T. allowed the revision vide its judgment and order dated 4/2/1991 and set aside the order of remand dated 21/7/1989. It is in this situation, writ petition came to be filed in this court.

(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In my view the writ petition needs to be partly allowed, on a legal point which is well settled. On a perusal of the record, it appears that a proceeding for surrender of tenancy and restoration of possession to the landlord in Tenancy case No. 239/1956-57 was decided by the Mamlatdar on 23/8/1956. On this date, by Bombay Act 13/1956 (brought into effect from 1/8/1956) Section 15 which related to surrender of right by a tenant had been introduced into the said Act. Under the newly introduced Section 15 of the said Act, the surrender by a tenant of his tenancy was required to be hand written and verified before the Mamlatdar in the prescribed manner. The prescribed procedure to be followed by the mamlatdar was laid down in Rule 2-A of the b. T. A. L. Rules, 1949. The said Rule 2-A was in the following terms :"the Mamlatdar when verifying a surrender of a tenancy by a tenant in favour of the landlord under clause (b) of Sub-section (3) of Section 5, shall satisfy himself, after such enquiry as he thinks fit, that the tenant understands the nature and consequences of the surrender and also that it is voluntary and shall endorse his findings in that behalf upon the document of surrender. "