(1.) By preferring the present Criminal Revision Application, the State is questioning the correctness and propriety of the Judgment and Order passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Parbhani, Dist. Parbhani dated 25th January, 2000 in Cri.Revn.No.116/1999 by which the learned Revisional Court was pleased to allow the Cri.Revision by setting aside the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, dated 1st July, 1999 passed below Exh.No.63 in R.C.C.No.258 Of 1997 whereby the learned trial Magistrate was pleased to reject the application on behalf of the present Non-Applicants to discharge them from the case. Thus, the State is challenging the order of discharge made by the learned Revisional Court in the Criminal Revision.
(2.) The factual matrix is summarized herein-below :-
(3.) The Public Analyst report is at Exh.No.48. In the report, the Public Analyst has expressed his opinion as under :-