(1.) RULE made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of the parties.
(2.) IN this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India petitioner-wife challenges the order dated 10-02-2004 passed by Family Court No. 2 at nagpur in Petition No. 380 of 1999 by which the learned Presiding Officer has rejected her application for permission to cross-examine respondent-husband. The said application appears to have been moved on 05-11-2003 and reason given in it is that the counsel who was to cross-examine the respondent-husband was busy in some other matter.
(3.) THE learned counsel appearing for petitioner wife states that if the respondent husband is not permitted to be cross-examined it will be a lacuna in the entire proceedings and it will not be conducive to complete justice between the parties.