REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Chandrakant Nivruti Wagh Appellant

V/S

Manisha C.Wagh Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

VISHAL DAMODAR PATIL VS. VISHAKHA VISHAL PATIL [REFERRED TO : 2009 CR.L.J. 107 5]
NANDKISHOR DAMODAR VINCHURKAR VS. KAVITA NANDKISHOR VINCHURKAR [REFERRED TO : CRI. APPL. NO.2970/2008,DT.5.8.2009 6]
ARCHANA HEMANT NAIK VS. URMILABEM I NAIK [REFERRED TO : 2010 CRI. L.J. 751 17,20]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. VIRENDRA ALIAS SHAHRUKH KHAN VASUDEO SADA [REFERRED TO]
RAOSAHEB PANDHARINATH KAMBLE VS. SHAILA RAOSAHEB KAMBLE [REFERRED TO : 2010 CR.L.J. 3596 5]
KARIMKHAN VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO : 2011 CR.L.J. 4793 8]
MANOJ HARIKISANJI CHANGANI VS. SAU. PREMA SHRINIVAS CHANGANI [REFERRED TO : CRI. APPL. NO.564/2011,DT.11.1.2012 9]
SAGAR SUDHAKAR SHENDGE VS. NAINA SAGAR SHENDGE [REFERRED TO : CRI.W.P. NO.236/2013,DT.4.4.2013 14]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rule. Made returnable forthwith.

(2.) The petitioners also made the application that the application under the D.V. Act was not in a prescribed form which was mandatory under Section 12 as well as under Section 23 of the Act and that the applicant has not furnished details of the previous litigation required under Form II.

(3.) The D.V. Act is a beneficial legislation. It is meant for protection of violated women. It is upon the acceptance that such women may not have the necessary legal advice.

Click here to view full judgment.

CHANDRAKANT NIVRUTI WAGH Vs. MANISHA C.WAGH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address