Home
About Us
Support
Browse Database
Contact Us
LOGIN
LAWS(BOM)-2013-5-49
PISHU MULCHAND MAHTANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Decided On May 06, 2013
Pishu Mulchand Mahtani
Appellant
V/S
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondents
Referred Judgements :-
STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLAINTIFF THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF MADHYA PRADESH THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ASSAM THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ORISSA THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR T VS. UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFE
[REFERRED TO]
GIRDHARI LAL GUPTA VS. D H MEHTA
[REFERRED TO]
R S JOSHI SALES TAX OFFICER GUJARAT J S JOSHI SALES TAX OFFICER GUJARAT VS. AJIT MILLS LTD:IDAR TALUKA SAHAKARI
[REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. RAM KISHAN ROHTAGT
[REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT TRAVANCORE AGENCY COCHIN VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KERALA ERNAKULAM
[REFERRED TO]
SHAM SUNDER VS. STATE OF HARYANA
[REFERRED TO]
R S RAGHUNATH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA
[REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT VS. M C T M CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED
[REFERRED TO]
J K INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. CHIEF INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS
[REFERRED TO]
PEPSI FOODS LIMITED VS. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
[REFERRED TO]
KATTA SUJATHA VS. FERTILIZER AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LIMITED
[REFERRED TO]
BALRAM KUMAWAT VS. UNION OF INDIA
[REFERRED TO]
SWEDISH MATCH AB VS. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD INDIA
[REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN SEBI VS. SHRIRAM MUTUAL FUND
[REFERRED TO]
SABITHA RAMAMURTHY VS. R B S CHANNABASAVARADHYA
[REFERRED TO]
MAKSUD SAIYED VS. STATE OF GUJARAT
[REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. DHARMENDRA TEXTILE PROCESSORS
[REFERRED TO]
K K AHUJA VS. V K VORA
[REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORP LTD VS. HARMEET SINGH PAINTAL
[REFERRED TO]
SECURITIES and EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA VS. CABOT INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL CORPORATION
[REFERRED TO]
JUDGEMENT
(1.) Rule.
(2.) The Respondents waive service.
(3.) By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith.
Click here to view full judgment.