LAWS(BOM)-2003-6-97

MILIND ATRNARAM PAWAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided On June 23, 2003
MILIND ATMARAM PAWAR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Gandhi, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and Mr. Mirza, the learned A. P. P. for the non-applicant-State.

(2.) THE present application is preferred by the applicants original accused in the Sessions Trial No. 200 of 1994 challenging the order passed by the sessions Judge, Akola on 2-2-1999 whereunder the Sessions Court has quashed and set aside the order of committal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First ckss, Murtizapur, dt. 5-12-1994 and remanded back the entire proceedings to the Judicial Magistrate for holding the committal proceedings as per law.

(3.) APPLICANTS were, in fact, tried before the learned Sessions Judge for the charge of committing murder of one Ramesh Ahire. One Lalita Ashok Tayade and her husband Ashok Tayade were also charge-sheeted along with the present applicants in Crime No. 202 of 1994 for murder of victim Ramesh. In that, Ashok Tayade was already discharged under section 169 of the Code of criminal Procedure by the Court in pursuance of the report made by the investigating Officer. As per the prosecution case, victim Ramesh was done to death by the applicants and accused Lalita. Accused Lalita was granted bail on 31/08/1994 by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Murtizapur. After that, on 16-9-1994, she appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, akola with a prayer in the application that she wanted to be an approver and prosecution witness and as such, she sought pardon. The Investigating Officer gave his no objection and on 16-9-1994 itself, her statement was recorded by the incharge, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola wherein she made all the disclosures about the same. After completing investigation on 16-11-1994, the Investigating Officer filed charge-sheet against three persons including accused Lalita and the present applicants. It was specifically mentioned in the charge-sheet that accused Lalita was tendered pardon and that she was examined as an approver and prosecution witness. On 5-12-1994 the learned magistrate, Murtizapur committed the case to the Court of Sessions against both the accused.