SANGAPPA V TENGINAKAI Vs. ATMARAM J SHETTYE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS Criminal Revision Application has been filed by the original complainant assailing the Judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, dated 13th August 2003, acquitting the respondent for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 364 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Notice was issued to the respondent/accused and the respondent/accused is represented by his counsel. The applicant/original complainant was asked whether a lawyer from the Legal Aid Panel be appointed to argue the revision? However, he stated that he would argue it in person. Records and Proceedings of the trial Court have been called for.

(2.) THE Apex Court in K. Chinnaswamy Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh and another, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 1788, in paragraph 7 has held as under:-

(3.) THE Apex Court in Bindeshwari Prasad Singh alias B.P. Singh and others v. State of Bihar (nowalias B.P. Singh and another, (2002) 6 S.C.C. 650, in paragraph 14 has held as under:-