REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BAL KALYANI Appellant

V/S

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

ASIF HAMEED AND OTHERS V. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
FORESHORE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY V. N. H. SAMITI [REFERRED TO]
BACHHITTAR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
E P ROYAPPA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
GULAM MUSTAFA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
KEDAR NATH BAHL VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
RAMANA DAYARAM SHETTY VS. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION ALPANA V MEHTA VS. PARITOSH BHUPESHKUMAR SHETH:MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION [DISTINGUSHED AIR 1979 SC 1628 16]
K NAGARAJ D SHANKARAN D SUBBA RAJU VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:CHIEF SECRETARY OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
HEM LALL BHANDARI VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [REFERRED TO]
J R RAGHUPATHY K MALLIAH M PAMPAPATHAIAH VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:S BAL REDDY:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SIBAL MISS RITLJ KHANNA VS. PUNJAB UNLVERSRTY:PUNJAB UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO]
SRINIKETAN CO OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED VS. VIKAS VIHAR COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK VISHNU KATE VS. M R BHOPE JUDGE LABOUR COURT BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) What the case is about : Malabar Hill of Bombay is well-known all over the world and for very long time. Bombay's general transformation into a nineteenth century urban metropolis did not spoil it much. A guide-book of 1865 remarks :

(2.) This litigation concerns that most valuable land. 'Rocky Hill' is an enclave in Malabar Hill. Some area is occupied by the flats constructed therein. They are inhabited by Judges and Ministers, mostly by Judges. The land has been in possession of the Public Works Department from 1909 onwards. In the prosaics of the Revenue Department, it is an area comprised in City Survey No. 211 of Malabar Hill Division.

(3.) There are two Writ Petitions, one on behalf of an applicant who runs a small school 'Balkalyani' for young children in a plot in that very area (Writ Petition No. 2085 of 1989), and the other by 'Save Bombay Committee'- a public interest group (Writ Petition No. 1754 of 1989).

Click here to view full judgment.

BAL KALYANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address