(1.) Feeling aggrieved by the common judgment and award passed in L.A.R. No. 9 of 2001 with connected L.A.R. proceedings, the original claimant in L.A.R. No. 9 of 2001 has preferred this appeal for enhancement of compensation.
(2.) The brief facts of the appeal are as under:
(3.) Heard Mr. Anand Bhandari, learned counsel for the appellants/original claimants, Mr. A.M. Phule, learned AGP for Respondent no. 1/State and Ms. Ranjana Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No. 4/M.S.R.T.C. Respondent no. 3 though duly served, remained absent. The appeal came to be dismissed against respondent nos. 2/1 and 2/2.