MAHADEO SHANKAR DHAYGUDE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 30.4.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati convicting them for commission of offence under Sections 148, 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and to pay fine of Rs.500/ - & in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month on first count; to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5000/ - & in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months on second count and suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.500/ - & in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days on third count.

(2.) ALL the said appellants (hereinafter for short referred as A1 to A9 as per the names in the title clause) at trial were charged for commission of offences under Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 325, 147, 148, 149, 337, 323, 504 and 506 of I.P.C.

(3.) ACCORDING to the prosecution, first informant PW1 Kashinath was residing at village Nira -wagaj along with mother, wife Surekha, sons Harishchandra and Manohar and daughter Vidya.