(1.) HEARD Mr. Jetly, learned counsel for the Revenue and Mr. Umesh R. Phalorh, Chief Financial Officer of the respondent in person. This appeal was admitted on 18 -10 -2006 on the following questions of law: - -
(2.) THE respondent -assessee, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) failed to fulfil the export obligation even after importing duty free import of raw materials to the tune of Rs. 3.94 crore. As a result of not fulfilling the export obligation, proceeding was initiated and by an order dated 17 -2 -2004, the entire duty demand with interest was confirmed and penalty was also imposed.
(3.) ACCORDINGLY , the impugned order dated 27 -5 -2005 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Tribunal for considering the grounds on which the assessee has challenged the Order -in -Original dated 17 -2 -2004. The appeal is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs.