REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SHEOSHANKAR Appellant

V/S

STATE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

'LARAGOITY V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL' [REFERRED TO]
'DEARE V.ATTORNEY-GENERAL' [REFERRED TO]
'KING V. BRECKNOCK' [REFERRED TO]
'ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. SILEM' [REFERRED TO]
'SMITH V. BROWN' [REFERRED TO]
'COUSINS V. LOMBARD BANK' [REFERRED TO]
'NIREAHA TAMAK V.BAKER' [REFERRED TO]
'YICK WO V. HOPKINS' [REFERRED TO]
'TARRANCE V. FLORIDA' [REFERRED TO]
'MARSHALL FIELD AND CO. V. CLARK' [REFERRED TO]
'PEMBINE MINING CO. V. PENNSYLVANIA' [REFERRED TO]
'MUNN V. ILLINOIS' [REFERRED TO]
'BARRACLOUGH V. BROWN' [REFERRED TO]
'GLASGOW NAVIGATION CO. V. IRON ORE CO.' [REFERRED TO]
'ADKINS V. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL' [REFERRED TO]
'ANANT BHASKAR LAGU V. STATE' [REFERRED TO]
'HARENDRANATH V. STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT' [REFERRED TO]
'TOOWOOMBA FOUNDRY PTY.,LTD. V. THE COMMONWEALTH' [REFERRED TO]
'EUCLID V. AMBLER REALTY CO." [REFERRED TO]
'PIERCE V. SOCIETY OF SISTERS' [REFERRED TO]
'NASHVILLE V. WALLACE,' [REFERRED TO]
COMMONWEALTH V. COLONIAL SUGAR REFINING CO.' [REFERRED TO]
'COMMONWEALTH V. QUEENSLAND' [REFERRED TO]
'BURGHES V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL' [REFERRED TO]
'WIGG V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE IRISH FREE STATE1 [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. V. SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
'DYSON V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL' [REFERRED TO]
'REX V. HANLEY REVISING BARRISTER' [REFERRED TO]
ALBERTA V. ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR CANADA' [REFERRED TO]
A K GOPALAN VS. STATE OF MADRAS OPPOSITE PARTY; UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
N B KHARE VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
JESHINGBHAI ISHWARLAL VS. EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application purporting to be under Article 226 of the constitution for the following reliefs:

(2.) THE petitioner states that he is a permanent resident of Nagpur and is earning Rs. 100 per month and has been accustomed for a number of years to take alcoholic drinks, generally country liquor, at an average of 4 ounces per day.

(3.) SINCE the enforcement of the Central Provinces and Berar Prohibition act, 1938 (Act VII (7) of 1938), in the Nagpur District by Notification no. 652-800-VIII, dated 5-8-1946 the petitioner had to stop consumption of country liquor altogether inasmuch as a permit for bottled foreign liquor in forms F. L. XII and XII-A alone is available under rules 7 and 7-A, Central Provinces and Berar Foreign Liquor Rules, 1938, issued by the Govt. under Sections 30. 32, 33 and 68 (2) (f) and (i) of the said Act and under Notification No. 1271-1095-VIII dated 2-1-1938. Even this permit is subject to the condition that the licensing authority should be satisfied that the social and economic status of the petitioner warrant the grant of a permit and that the petitioner is not likely to abuse it.

Click here to view full judgment.

SHEOSHANKAR Vs. STATE GOVT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address