LAWS(BOM)-2021-8-141

PRAKASH BABARAO SHINGANE Vs. JANTA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Decided On August 25, 2021
Prakash Babarao Shingane Appellant
V/S
Janta Education Society Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this Letters Patent Appeal, challenge is to the Judgment and order dated 04/11/2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.891/2006, whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition and quashed and set aside the order passed by the Presiding Officer of School Tribunal, Amravati dated 11/10/2005. The Presiding Officer of School Tribunal, Amravati by the said order dated 11/10/2005 had allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and directed his reinstatement in service with back-wages.

(2.) The respondent No.1 is a registered society and registered Public Trust. It runs Smt. Shewantabai Kalmegh High School and Junior College at Chausala, Tq. Anjangaon Surji, Dist. Amravati. It is the case of the appellant that at the time of his first appointment on 02/08/1985 on fixed salary of Rs.250/- per month for a period up to 30/06/1986, he was possessing the qualification of M. Com. B.P.Ed. The Director of Education approved his appointment on pay scale of Rs.250/- - Rs.450/- for Academic Session 1985-1986 for the subjects of Commerce and Physical Education. As per the order dated 28/06/1986, the said appointment was continued for a period from 01/07/1986 to 08/05/1987 on a fixed pay of Rs.500/- per month. The Deputy Director of Education granted approval to this appointment on 23/02/1987. It is the case of the appellant that he was appointed vide order dated 09/07/1987 on clock hour basis for the period from 09/07/1987 to 24/03/1988. The Deputy Director of Education vide order dated 17/10/1988 granted approval to this appointment from 09/07/1987 till the end of Academic Session 1987-1988. The appellant has made a grievance that this order was fabricated because in fact, he was appointed from 09/07/1987 to 24/03/1988 in a clear vacancy.

(3.) It is further stated that later on, the respondent No.1 by following due procedure appointed the appellant as Lecturer on probation of two years by order dated 18/08/1988. He continued to serve till his oral termination on 26/06/1991. It is his case that on the date of his termination, he had acquired the status of deemed confirmed employee under the provisions of Section 5 (2) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (Hereinafter referred to as "the M.E.P.S. Act").