REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Tirupati Construction Appellant

V/S

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

HARINDER SINGH VS. S KAMAIL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
TATA CELLULAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR JOSHI VS. NITIN BHAURAO PATIL [REFERRED TO]
MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN SEAMLESS STEEL AND ALLOYS LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH MANDAL VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwit h. Heard finally at admission stage with the consent of both the sides.

(2.) The factual matrix is as under:

(3.) Heard Mr. N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K.N. Lokhande, learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1, Mr. U.B. Bondar, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and Mr. A.S. Shivpuje, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Perused the documents and papers placed on record by both the sides.

Click here to view full judgment.

TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address