EVERTIME OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner claimed that he is entitled to refund under the provisions of section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter "the IGST Act " for short). It is the case of learned counsel that in respect of the goods that have been supplied, the petitioner is entitled to claim the refund under sub-section 3(b) of section 16 of the said Act. It is submitted that the claim for refund is not being processed by respondent no.4 on the ground that the investigation is pending against the petitioner.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the provisions of sub-section 10 of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter "the CGST Act " for short). Sub-section 10 of section 54 of the CGST Act reads thus :-

(3.) Learned counsel submits that in the teeth of the provisions of sub-section 10 of section 54 of the CGST Act, the action on the part of the respondents refusing to process the refund on the ground that the investigation is pending is untenable. Our attention is invited to one such application made on May 18, 2021 which is at page 92 of the petition seeking release of the outstanding amount of drawback and IGST refund.