LAWS(BOM)-2011-12-96

OGBU AWAH Vs. NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU

Decided On December 09, 2011
OGBU AWAH Appellant
V/S
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 31 st August, 2005 passed by the Special Judge appointed under the NDPS Act. The appellant has been convicted of the offences punishable u/ss. 21(C) r/w. 29 and 23(C) r/w. 28 of the NDPS Act. For both the conviction he has been sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years each and to pay a fine of Rs.10 lakhs each and in default, to undergo RI for 3 months each.

(2.) The appellant is a Nigerian national. He had come to Mumbai on 30 th June, 2002 and was staying at Hotel Colaba Causeway. The officers of Narcotics Control Bureau, Mumbai, has intercepted him at Sahar International Airport on the basis of certain information that he would be carrying Heroin by Swiss International Airlines Flight No.LX 155 ETD. His checked-in baggage and cabin baggage was subjected to search. He was given opportunity of being searched in presence of a Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate as provided by the law. He refused to avail the said opportunity. Nothing incriminating was found during the course of search of his checked-in baggage. However, Heroin weighing 1.200 kgs. was recovered from his cabin baggage which was concealed in a false bottom of his VIP skybag. The same was seized. Two samples were drawn. The samples were named as Awah-I and Awah-II, respectively. The bulk quantity was packed in cartoon and sealed. Panchnama was prepared. The documents found during personal search of the appellant and his travel documents were seized under the panchnama. His statement u/s. 67 of the NDPS Act was recorded.

(3.) During the course of recording of statement of appellant, it was revealed that he was staying at Spain since 1998. He came to Mumbai on 30 th June, 2002. He had a Nigerian friend by name Peter who stays in Amsterdam. The appellant was offered 2000 US Dollars by the said Peter for carrying drugs from India. The appellant was assured that there would not be any chance of appellant being apprehended. The appellant, therefore, accepted the proposal and undertook to carry out the job. His arrangements for journey from Spain to India were made by Peter. After reaching India, the appellant had received Rs.2,70,000/- from Mr.Peter through Western Union Money Transfer. One African National had visited hotel room of the appellant on 11 th July, 2002. The appellant had paid Rs.2 lakhs to the said African national as directed by the Peter and in exchange received suitcase from the said African national.