PADAMSINH B. PATIL Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This revision application assails the legality, propriety and correctness of an order passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI for Grater Mumbai, on an application for summoning the defence witnesses (Exhibit-1581) in Sessions Case No.1146 of 2013, whereby the learned Special Judge was persuaded to partly allow the application to the extent of examination of one witness, namely, Abhay Suresh Pandit, out of 39 witnesses, who were cited by name and/or designation, by the applicant - accused no.1.

(2.) The revision application arises in the backdrop of the following facts:

(3.) Being aggrieved by and dissatisfed with the impugned order, the applicant - accused no.1 has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court.