LAWS(BOM)-2020-9-141

FARUK Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided On September 14, 2020
Faruk Appellant
V/S
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.

(2.) All these proceedings are filed for the relief of direction to continue the parole already granted by this Court under the Notification of the Government dated 8th May 2020. The Notification is as under :

(3.) In the past, this Court had occasion to interpret the aforesaid Notification in respect of period of parole in the case of Dinesh Vs. State and others in Cri. Writ Petition No. 578 of 2020, decided on 30th June 2020. In the Notification, it is mentioned that the initial period of parole will be 45 days and it shall stand extended periodically in blocks of 30 days each, till such time that the said notification is in force. This Court has laid down that the meaning of this provision is that there will be automatic extension of the parole period till the notification is in force. Even when such meaning is there and the interpretation is done by this Court, it appears that the respondents are asking the prisoners to give application for extension every time for getting extension of parole. There is news item both in print media and electronic media that some persons had asked prisoners to give money either to accept their applications or for consideration of their application. When there is automatic extension of parole period, there is no need of giving application every time when parole period expires. In view of lock-down which was declared and the object behind the notification, no other interpretation is possible. It appears that there is also some wrong notion that when the Court has granted parole under order, the period mentioned in the order will come to an end and after that period application will be required. When order is made by the Court under the notification dated 8th May 2020, one needs to go with the presumption that such order is similar to the order made by the Prisoner Authority, Superintendent. Thus, in that case also, no application is required to be made by the prisoners for extension of parole period. So many applications are received of such nature by this Court and that has increased the work of this Court unnecessarily. This Court has already expressed that it is always open to the Government to withdraw the notification and call back the prisoners. That can be done but till the notification is there, the parole period will get extended automatically in view of the aforesaid nature of the Notification. In the result, all these applications are allowed. It is hereby declared that the parole period automatically got extended in view of the wordings of the Notification. It is also hereby directed that the respondents are to see that no applications for extension of parole period are asked from any prisoner when the prisoners are released by Jail Authority under the notification or due to the order of this Court made under the Notification dated 8 th May 2020. Unless the Court has specifically declared that beyond that period there will not be extension of the parole period, the authority needs to go with the presumption that there is automatic extension of the parole period.