(1.) RULE, returnable forthwith, by consent.
(2.) '' The petition has been filed to challenge the order of the Industrial Court in revision application (ULP) No.126 of 2009 and 129 of 2009. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows:
(3.) '' Evidence was led by the respondent before the Labour Court. It appears however that no witness was examined by the petitioner. The respondent admitted that she did not inform the Collector's office that she was married when she received the appointment order. However, she has denied that she did so deliberately with the intention to "grab" the appointment.