TANNU Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, at length and in detail. Sri Vinai Malaviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U. P representing the respondents, has also been heard.

(2.) THE respondents were granted time to file counter-affidavit as long back as on 10-11-1993, but no counter-affidavit has been filed on their behalf.

(3.) SRI Satish Trivedi, learned counsel of the petitioner, submits that the im pugned notice is not in conformity with the requirements of Section 3 of the Act inas much as it does not inform the petitioner of the general nature of the material al legations against him.