D R RAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Yog, J. All the respondents the represented by Standing Counsel. A counter-affidavit has been filed. Rejoinder- Affidavit has also been filed today in Court along with an application to grant interim order. Office to take the rejoinder-affidavit on record.

(2.) SINCE the in deciding ad interim order, Court is to consume the time in which the writ petition itself can be finally disposed of, it is deemed appropriate that writ petition may be heard finally. Counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel have no objection The writ peti tion is, therefore, decided finally at this stage.

(3.) HAVING heard learned Counsels for the parties and considering submissions at length it is borne out from the records that the statement contained in paragraph 35 of the writ petition (complaining that impugned order was passed without notice or affording opportunity of hearing) has not been denied by the Respondents in para graph 13 of the counter-affidavit. In fact, averments in paragraph 35 of the petition have not at all been controverter in para graph 13 of the counter-affidavit.