GIRIJA SHANKAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned AGA.

(2.) A notice under Section 3 (1) of the U. P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 has been served upon the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the notice in question is bad in law on account of the fact that material details and the substance of the offences have not been specified in the notice. The learned Counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the Full Bench decision of this Court in Bhim Singh Tyagi v. State of U. R, 1999 (39) ACC 321 (FB) ; 1999 (2) JIC 192 (All) (FB ).