LAWS(ALL)-1999-9-141

CHHOTEY LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On September 22, 1999
CHHOTEY LAL Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VIRENDRA Saran, J. Chhotey, Bharat, Chedi, Nankoo, Ram Pujari and Shoo Kumar have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 28-8-1984 of the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Gonda, passed in S. T No. 117/84 convicting the appellants under Section201, I. P. C. to 3years R. I. and a fine of Rs. 500/eaeh. In default of payment of fine the appel lants were to suffer 3 months' R. I. Besides the appellants there were six of her accused at the trial who were aequitted. Initially the case was under Section 302/34 and Section 201, I. P. C. Bui the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellants only for the offence under Section 201, I. P. C.

(2.) THE prosecution case is that in formant Salik Ram of his daughter Suchita Devi married to appellant Sheo Kumar. In April 1983 after performance of Gauna ceremony Suchita Devi went to her in laws house. On 26-6-1983 appellant sent information to the informant regard ing the death of Suchita Devi on 26-6-1983. When THE informant and his family members wanted to go to participate in the cremation of Suchita Devi, appellant Nankoo told the informant and cremation has already been done. THE informantion here after lodged F. I. R. stating that either Suchita Devi had been burnt alive or was cremated after being killed.

(3.) AFTER scrutinising The entire evidence on record, the learned trial Judge held that even though there was some evidence on the record but no such proof could be found which may suggest that any of the accused facing trial had committed the offence of murder. He further held that only this much was revealed by the evidence that the deccased was done to death and the family members in The house of the in-laws of The deccased had knowledge but besides holding that the death of Suchita Devi was unnatural there was no evidence to connect any of the accused withoffence of murder. 'on this finding, The learned Sessions Judge acquilied six out of twelve accused lacing trial but conviclcd the six appellanis for The offence under Section 201, I. P. C. on the ground that they were involved in cremation of the deccased.