ROOBI Vs. RUPESH KUMAR GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VIRENDRA Saran, J. The present Habeas Corpus writ petition has been preferred on behalf of Smt. Roobi wife of Abdul Farced and Km. Nida, 8 years old minor daughter of Abdul Farced. In fact, the Habeas Corpus writ petition has been filed by Abdul Farced who has signed the vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners.

(2.) BY means of this writ petition, Abdul Farced has prayed for a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for setting free the petitioners. In the petition, Rupesh Kumar Gupta and Prakash Gupta have been arrayed as opposite parties.

(3.) SINCE Smt. Roobi has stated that she is living separately and she is a major and further she denied the allegation of illegal confinement by the opposite par ties, this Habeas Corpus writ petition regarding Smt. Roobi fails. Custody of Km. Sada having been given to Abdul Farced, the proceedings in this writ petition regarding the custody of the child also stands concluded.