KAHKASHAN PARVEEN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE two petitions re late to two different proceedings but were heard together as certain common ques tions of law were raised by Sri D. S. Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners in the first mentioned case and Sri U. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner in the second mentioned case. We had heard Sri Amarjeet Singh, learned AGA for the State in both the cases.

(2.) IN Writ Petition No. 3983 of 1999 an action under Section 14 of the U. P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) by the District Magistrate, Bareilly is under question whereby the District Magistrate directed attachment of certain properties indicated in the order, dated 30-6-1999 under the purported exercise of his powers under Section 14 of the said Act.

(3.) OBJECTIONS were also taken on the legality of the action of the D. M. in locking the premises of the petitioners and in not following the provisions of attachment as envisaged under Section 83 of the Cr. P. C. This point again may not be gone into for the reasons indicated above.