RADHEY SHYAM KATIYAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. Heard Sri J. S. Sengor, learned Counsel for the applicants and Sri G. C. Saxena, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

(2.) THIS is a petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C. to stay the proceedings of case No. 5975 of 1999, pending in the Court of C. M. M. , Kanpur Nagar against petitioners.

(3.) I have considered the arguments. The charge sheet against the applicants can not be quashed for the reason that cog nizance was taken by the Court on the charge sheet against opposite party No. 2. No inves tigation was done against opposite party No. 2 and there is no bar for investigating the matter against other accused against whom the charge sheet was not submitted in spite of the fact that cognizance of the offence was taken against some accused on the basis of the charge sheet.