SHIV PRATAP SINGH Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Yog, J. The present petition contains several corrections by hand. These insertions are in different ink and different hand writing. Some of these cut tings and insertions purports to have been initialed by the Oath Commissioner and some of the cuttings are not initialed (see page 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 of the writ paper book ). Even the typed copies of the annexures have not been filed besides there annexures are not being accompanied or bear title of the case as required under Rules of the Court.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner prays for filing a fresh petition duly sworn by Oath Commissioner Prayer allowed. Petitioner shall indicate factum of filing of present petition in the proposal fresh peti tion to be filed in accordance with law and the Rules of the Court. Petitioner shall also indicate that the case was tied up with this bench on nomination being made by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

(3.) PETITIONER may apply for taking back certified copy of the impugned order (Annexed page 38 of the writ paper book), PETITIONER shall submit duly verified copy of the said certified copy for being sub stituted in place of the original certified copy. Petition dismissed. .