DILIP Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) M. Quddusi, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A. G. A.

(2.) VIDE order, dated 24-6-1999 the alleged informant of First Information Report registered as Case Crime No. 84/99 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 346, 506, I. P. C. and 3 (i) (x) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Act, Police Station Kabrai, District Mahoba was summoned by this Court in person, as it was alleged in the writ petition that:- "it was a dispute between the eminent parties and deponent/so-called complainant of the case has been misguided by the sitting M. L. A. namely, Arimardan Singh and his signa ture on the blank paper was obtained which resulted in the F. I. R. against the petitioner with the collusion of the local police and F. I. R. is registered in Case Crime No. 84/99 under Sec tions 147/148/149/346/506, I. P. C. and 3 (i) (x) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, Police Station Kabrai, District Mahoba on 7-3-1999, a true copy of which is being filed as Annexure 5 to the writ petition. "

(3.) THAT the deponent/so called com plainant of this case again met the I. O. but no statement of the deponent/so called complainant was recorded by the I. O. by saying this fact that his statement "under Section 161 Cr. PC. has already been recorded. "