MOHD NAYEEM ANJUM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. Heard Sri S. C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A. P. Tiwari, learned counsel for op posite parties No. 2 and 3 and the learned A. G. A.

(2.) THE applicant is the father of op posite parties No. 2 and 3, who are minors. THEy moved an application under Section 125, Cr. P. C. through their mother, on which the maintenance allowance of Rs. 100/- each was granted to them. On their subsequent application under Section 127, Cr. P. C. through their mother the main tenance allowance has been enhanced to Rs. 500/- each by the impugned order dated 4-3-98 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Nagar. Aggrieved by that order, the present revision has been filed.

(3.) THE revision is accordingly allowed and the impugned order dated 4-3-98 is set aside. THE matter is sent back for re-decision on the application under Section 127, Cr. P. C. of the opposite parties No. 2 and 3 along with the application of the applicant for setting aside the order of maintenance. Revision allowed. .