(1.) M. C. Jain, J. 1. This revision has been filed by two revisionists against the judg ment and order dated 4-4-1998 passed by Sessions Judge, Hardwar in Criminal Misc. Case No. 89/1997. Each of them has been directed to deposit Rs. 12,500 towards the surety bond executed by each of them.
(2.) EACH of them had executed the surety bond of Rs. 20,000 for one Asgar. Accused Asgar absconded during the trial and the notices under Section 446, Cr. P. C. were issued to the sureties (the present revisionists ). Ultimately the recovery was issued against each of them for recovery of Rs. 20,000. They preferred appeal with an application under Section 5 of the Limita tion Act which was dismissed by the impugned judgment.