KUKAM DAI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. K. Singh, J. Heard Mr. Onkar Singh, learned Counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Brijesh Sahai, Counsel for the opposite parties No. 2, 3 and 4 and Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, learned A. G. A. for the opposite party No. 1.

(2.) THE challenge in the revision peti tion is against the order dated 18th April, 1990 passed by the 3rd Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Saharanpur in criminal revision No. 366 of 1989.

(3.) THE revision petition, therefore, does not disclose merits and the same is dismissed. Revision dismissed. .