RAMAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) J. C. Mishra, J. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 20-12-83 passed by Additional Ses sions Judge, Mathura dismissing the ap peal preferred against the judgment and order dated 15-4-83 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Mathura convicting the revisionists under Section 411, IPC and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year.

(2.) DESPITE the list being revised, none appeared to press this revision.

(3.) AFTER having gone through the evidence with the help of learned A. G. A, I find that the prosecution succeeded in proving its case beyond shadow of doubt that the accused committed offence punishable under Section 411, IPC. Though it was not a fit case for releasing the accused on probation but since the State has not come up in appeal, it cannot be interfered in revisional jurisdiction.