(1.) R. K. Singh, J. Heard Mr. A. R. B. Khare, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri B. S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the opposite party.
(2.) FOR appreciating the matter, learned counsel for the revisionist has been heard on the point of admission/final disposal of the revision petition.
(3.) THE statement of the revisionist demolishes the entire argument of Mr. Khare. He took plea in this Court that due to physical handicap of the husband-revisionist the wife/opposite party has deserted the revisionist and she is not en titled to maintenance. On the other hand the stand of the revisionist on oath in his deposition as O. P. W. is that he still con tinues in service and gets Rs. 834/- per month, he is ready to keep his wife subject to good character and behaviour of the wife opposite party.