ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BHAGWAN Din, J. List has been revised. None responds for the revisionist.

(2.) THE facts giving rise to present revision, briefly stated are that the op posite party No. 2, Smt. Kiran Tripathi filed an application under Section 125, Cr. P. C. against her husband, Ashutosh Tripathi, the revisionist, for grant of main tenance allowance with the allegations that the revisionist misbehaved and maltreated her, to press demand of Hero Honda Motor Cycle and Ginny in dowry. When the greed of her husband could not be fulfilled he gave such a corporal assault that even her ear was torn. In such state of condi tions she came to her father's house and is living with him. It is asserted by the opposite party No. 2 in her application that her husband is an employee in the Post Office, Ram Krishna Nagar, Kanpur and earning a salary of Rs. 3,000/-per month, that she is unable to main tain herself and that though her husband has sufficient means but neglects to maintain her.

(3.) I have gone through the record and perused the impugned judgment and order.