VAKEELA Vs. BHOPAL SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAM Janam Singh, Member Smt. Vakeela alias Sinni and others have filed this revision against the order dated 26-6-95 passed by learned Additional Commis sioner, Meerut Division.

(2.) REVISIONIST had filed a restoration application before the trial Court against the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 13-8-92 passed by learned SDC in Gopal Singh versus Gaon Sabha and others. REVISIONISTs claimed that Dharam Singh before his death had executed a sale-deed in their favour and by virtue of that sale-deed they are the legal representatives of the deceased Dharam Singh hence the res toration application dated 20-7-93 deser ves to be allowed and the ex-pane judg ment and decree dated 13-8-92 deserve to be set aside. The learned trial Court rejected the restoration application on the ground that the case had been finally decided and no case is pending and hence the application under Order IX, Rule 13, CPC had no relevance in the present con text and the said application was rejected under Order IX, Rule 13, CPC. This obser vation of the learned trial Court was con firmed by the learned Additional Commis sioner, Mecrul Division by his order dated 26-6-95. Aggrieved by this second revision is preferred before this Court.

(3.) I, therefore, find no force in the present revision and accordingly it is dis missed. Revision dismsised. .