DADHIBAL Vs. VINDHYACHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. R. Yadav, Member This is a revision against the order dated 23-12-95 passed by the learned Additional Com missioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakh-pur, arising out of the proceedings under Section 198 (4) of U. P. Z. A. & L. R. Act, Decided by the learned Additional Collec tor, Mau, vide the order dated 30-3-2001.

(2.) I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have gone through the relevant papers on file.

(3.) THE contention of the learned Counsel for the revisionist is that the LMC has not been imp leaded as party as such, the application being defective should have been dismissed. It is the LMC which supervisor and maintains the Gaon Sabha land ; hence it is mandatory for any proceeding that the LMC should be ar-rprayed as party in such proceeding ; ap parently this has not been done in the matter. It is also clear that before cancell ing the lease in question the lease-holders have not been issued even show cause notices which is against the principle of natural justice as well as against the provisions Laid down for the same.