RAM LAKHAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE prayer of the Petitioner is to quash the demand citation dated 28-8-1995 issued by Tehsildar, Tehsil Meja as contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition at the behest of Respondent No. 2, Bank of Baroda, Branch Bharatganj which has been sued through its Manager.

(2.) A perusal of Annexure-2 reveals that a sum of Rs. 14002/- was remained to be paid towards instalments by the petitioner and thus, he was asked to pay the same and appear before Respondent No. 3 on 4-94995 failing which steps can be taken for his arrest, attachment of his properties and their auction.

(3.) NO counter affidavit has been filed despite expiry of three years and ten months by now, by Respondent NO. 2, on whose behalf notice was accepted by Shri C. P. Mishra, its learned Counsel.