HARPHOOL SINGH Vs. DEO DUN SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAM Janam Singh, J. Revisionist Harphool Singh has filed this revision against the order dated 30-3-99 passed by Additional SDO Hapur with the allegation that the substitution applica tion which was moved by the opposite-party was time-barred and there was no application for recalling the abatement order. The objection of the revisionist was not considered the impugned order was passed by the trial Court. Without specific request for recalling the abatement order by the opposite party the Court is bound to reject such application.

(2.) I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and gone through the record carefully.