PROMOD KUMAR DUBEY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Prabhakar Sinha learned Counsel for the petitioner and Miss Minakshi Sharma learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner was appointed in 1989 on a Hass II post on 21-12-1989. The institution was taken in granl-in-aid with effect from 6-9-1989. The petitioner is working as clerk in Primary section of the institu tion, with regard to the employees work ing in Primary section of the Institution of Class III and Class IV posts no decision was taken. The District Inspector of Schools asked the management by D. O. letter dated 12-12-1990 for sending the name of the employees working in the primary section in the format so that the authorities may be communicated. The management send the required information to the District Inspector of Schools in which the petitioner was shown as working on Class III posts in the primary section of the Institution. Since nothing was done the petitioner has filed writ petition before this Court. By order dated 6-5-1992 this Court directed to District Inspector of Schools to decide the representation of the petitioner. The representation of the petitioner has been decided on 4-7-1992 by District Inspector of School which has been filed as Annexure 7 to the writ peti tion. The representation of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the primary section was being run by the In stitution without their being any grant-in-aid, the representation of the petitioner was rejected that under the grant-in-aid was only released with regard to teacher of the Institution and not with regard to Class III employees. In identical matter a Writ Petition No. 34067 of 1991 Sri Daya Shanker v. State of U. P. with regard to the same Institution this Court allowed the claim of Class III and Class IV and directed for payment of his salary by judgment dated 14-5-1993. The controversy in volved in this case is also convered by judg ment dated 14-5-1993 in Writ Petition No. 34067 of 1991 and the petitioner is also entitled for payment of his salary. The writ petition succeeds and is allowed. The order of District Inspector of School dated 4-7-1992 Annexure 7 to the writ petition passed by Respondent No. 2 is quashed. The Respondent No. 2 is directed to release the entire arrears of salary of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is served on Respondent No. 2. There shall be no order as to cost. Petition allowed. .